When organisations embark on an email archive migration, the project typically begins with evaluating tools or selecting a destination. But some of the most important decisions aren’t about what you migrate into, but what you understand before you start. Failing to analyse the right elements early in the process almost always results in scope creep, data loss risk or unexpected costs.
Here are the key things IT teams often forget – and why they really matter.
1. Archive data quality and duplication
Legacy archives tend to accumulate duplicates, orphaned messages, and inconsistent folder structures over time. These aren’t just cosmetic issues; they impact migration throughput, indexing accuracy, and search performance in the new environment. Without analysing and cleaning data first, you might migrate ten times more data than you need to, increasing cost, complexity, and duration.
2. Ownership and mailbox mapping
Many archives include mail for people who have long since left the organisation or whose mailboxes no longer exist. If you don’t establish a clear ownership and mapping strategy up front, you risk:
-
Migrating data to the wrong destination
-
Creating orphaned content
-
Violating retention policies for certain user groups
Correctly aligning source data to target accounts is foundational to a defensible archive migration.
3. Retention and deletion policies
Legacy archive platforms often use outdated or inconsistent retention rules. If you forget to analyse these policies before migration, you could replicate those inconsistencies in your new system, locking in compliance risk. Understanding what should stay, move or expire helps you build a migration scope that reflects modern governance, not legacy decisions.
4. Searchability and discoverability requirements
IT teams sometimes assume that target platforms will automatically deliver better search. While modern platforms like Microsoft 365 excel at unified search, the way data is indexed and tagged matters. Analysing search needs before you move ensures that users and Legal/IG teams can actually find what they need after the project finishes.
5. Technical constraints and throttling
Platforms like Microsoft 365 have throttling and ingestion limits that can affect migration throughput. Without understanding these upfront, teams find themselves delaying projects or investing in unnecessary parallel infrastructure.
Why early analysis saves time and money
It may feel counter-intuitive to spend more time upfront before moving data, but the alternative is often reactive firefighting: unexpected costs, prolonged migration cycles, and unhappy stakeholders. A well-planned analysis phase gives you:
-
Accurate scoping
-
Better cost forecasting
-
Fewer surprises mid-project
-
A smoother transition
In archive migration, what you know before you start shapes everything that comes after.
Want to find out how we analyse migrations? Contact us here: https://ultimatemigrator.com/contactus/